Thirteen years ago on 2 May 1997, Tony Blair ended the Thatcher years by defeating John Major. Thatcher’s period in office brought huge transition to the UK, both for country and individual; a transition that we still haven’t fully absorbed.
But it was clear to everyone thirteen years ago that this wasn’t going to be a re-run of James Callaghan’s ficticious “crisis what crisis” denouement. No – we all smelt the good times, Did We Not.
Then Diana died on 31 august 1997. But it was OK – we found that grief unified our sense of britishness; like any family, there were disagreements, yes; the Queen’s apparent reluctance to grieve confused many, for instance.
The many turned to money soon after – easy credit and a necessary inflation in the value of property to feed it… but yeah, we know how that one worked out.
So where did this golden age for the middle classes begin
–––––––––––––––––––––––
Firstly, the US
The Americans, through Blair’s more experienced doppleganger, Bill Clinton, became a dominant influence after the groundwork done by Thatcher and Reagan. The Simpsons had just started to gain an audience in 1997, and the corporate-owned internet was about to happen (these pernicious, high-consumerist, untouchable ad-vehicles still thrive today; it’s not all about physicalities like cola and starbucks and the baseball cap – that perennial sign of US cultural hegemony).
Secondly, society
Blair’s attempt to engender a fairer, more liberal society sadly resulted in a compaction rather than an enema of Thatcher’s policies – if you thought the inner city was grim in the 1970s, the 2000′s version… but yeah, we know how that one worked out too. The main problem was that the working classes (yes – working classes – this never was a flat society), demoralised by the decimation of the UK’s manufacturing base, took the liberal-left’s handout and never got up again. The Guardian newspaper then flourished as an enormous wave of social problem-solvers were recruited to look after the sub-working. But don’t shoot the messenger – I’m a guardian-reading chablis-sipper myself…
Lastly, the plot unravelled when most people – at last – at least subliminally – realised the purpose of fighting pointless, unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Oil.
Insert your favourite Charlie Brooker-ism here.
Well just let me correct something there. Like the guardian, america is a hugely diverse collection of individuals and I do enjoy it. The “america” talked about here is of course our old 20c friends – corporations; unelected power brokers; their kissing cousins running the mainstream media channels.
So how come new labour and Edinburgh
–––––––––––––––––––––––
Fettes College, where Tony Blair was educated.
Edinburgh University, where Gordon Brown was educated.
Loretto School, Alistair Darling…
…and so on. The links with other heavyweights in the edinburgh firmament are manifold and eclectic.
So how come Edinburgh does London and ends up in bed with the US
–––––––––––––––––––––––
The answer is that the dynastic chain needs to remain intact, and flourishing. Cameron, Cameron, Cameron… isn’t that a Scottish name?
This reality is connected to Stephen Hawking, who said this week in connection with light-speed colonialism –
“If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn’t turn out well for the Native Americans”
Despite the fact Hawking has contradicted himself, there is a clue here. We – as in the UK, Germany, France, Ireland, Spain, Portugal and Russia, et al - would fail the DNA test if implicated in what our relatives have done since 1776.
An Old Day Has Set, Has It Not – the end of an era
–––––––––––––––––––––––
So… as mentioned in a previous post… who are you going to choose tomorrow – Diana, or Jessica?
image : Scots Dragoon Guards Museum entrance, Edinburgh Castle
